Sheila's Books
Click on the covers to read more or order autographed copies!







My Webrings



Crazy Hip Blog Mamas Members!





Photobucket


Photobucket





Medical Billing
Medical Billing



Advertising
For ALL Your Graphic Needs

Dine Without Whine - A Family 

Friendly Weekly Menu Plan
Is University Overrated?
Every Friday my syndicated column appears in papers around North America. Here's this week's Reality Check:

With keen university students across the nation participating in gruesome initiation week activities this week, I decided a thought experiment on the value of higher education might be timely. Picture a bright 18-year-old who has been accepted into a high ranking liberal arts program. Instead of attending, though, she hits the job market. In twenty years, do you think there would be a difference in her earning potential from that of the typical high school grad?

I do. Sure she doesn’t have the degree, but her acceptance letter already proved her intelligence and motivation. Perhaps, then, liberal arts university graduates earn more than high school graduates simply due to self-selection. Those who are already inclined to earn more are also the ones who continue to higher education.

Certainly most high paying jobs—and especially those that are attractive to women—do require a degree. But I don’t think it’s because the job intrinsically needs the knowledge one derives from studying “Gendered Alternatives: Science Fiction and Fantasy”, or “Intimacy, Sexuality and Deviance in Early Modern Europe” (two recent courses offered at Queen’s), but because employers require a degree as an elaborate way to uncover good employees. And they assume that university grads are smarter and more motivated than high school grads.

So let’s ask a slightly different question: assuming she is hired in a corporate setting, despite her lack of degree, could she do the job as well as a university graduate?

That’s exactly the scenario educational researcher George Leef posed to several high priced lawyers: take ten students who have been accepted to Harvard Law, but imagine instead that they immediately apprenticed at a prestigious law firm. Would there be any difference in their job performance a decade later versus those who had actually graduated?

All the lawyers said no. But they went even further than that. They said those who had worked with the firm from the start would probably make better lawyers, because they had been trained specifically for the job. It’s not the education from Harvard that makes you a good employee; it’s the fact that you were accepted by Harvard in the first place.

In the 1950s a high school education was sufficient to land most white collar jobs. As more and more people attended university, though, more and more jobs began to require one, even though the skills required by jobs have not changed substantially. We’re just using the university system to vet the best employees.

I’m not sure, however, that this is even the most efficient way to sift through job applicants. Employers need employees with communication skills, problem-solving skills, and good work habits. Do university liberal arts programs even provide these? Hopefully they teach people to write well, but there’s no guarantee that a person who took four years of “Medieval Bodies: Traversing Sex and Gender in the Middle Ages” (at the prestigious Columbia University) will graduate knowing how to write memos and analyze strategic reports.

Recently I was chatting with the affable man who was installing hardwood in our dining room. Turns out he has a university degree in computers, which left him with no job prospects and major debt. So he began to install floors. There’s no training course; you just have to be good at what you do. Now he has his own business, he’s easily supporting his young family, and he’s making far more than he would have made otherwise.

This is a route that’s easily available to men. It’s harder for women for whom the trades aren’t as attractive, and I think that’s one reason the ratio of female to male in universities is now running at around three to two.

But at some point, all of us may start to realize that university is an awfully expensive and inefficient way to identify people who think on their own, write well, and work independently. Higher education still has value for its own sake. But if students’ goals are just to land a better job, perhaps there’s a better way. If we could find another route to credential people, or even just to test those essential skills, without requiring four years of a degree which costs tens of thousands of dollars, we might make life a lot easier for everyone.



Don't miss a Reality Check! Sign up to receive it FREE in your inbox here!

Reality Check, the book, makes great bathroom reading! A collection of 84 of my favorite columns, it's sure to keep you laughing, and make you think! Read more here.

To Love, Honor and Vacuum


Subscribe to my feed by clicking above!

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 3:12 PM , Blogger TRS said…

Also consider that it takes 10-12 years to pay off your university loan - and as a former employer of mine once mused... you're mortgaging your future.

Getting to work right out of high school puts you ahead of those who don't have mummy and daddy paying the way through college.

That my experience... me and my bachelor's degree can never afford to buy a new sofa!!!

 

At 3:54 PM , Blogger Kimberly said…

Speaking from an emplpoers perspective, as far as getting a degree or a certificate from a school university/college or even a tech school, does not mean that you would be a great employee. I would prefer to be hiring some one with actuall experience and who can be depended on than some one just because they have a piece of paper.

 

At 5:08 PM , Blogger pedalpower said…

All you wrote is true and I have encountered it many times when looking for a job....right off the bat they want you to have degree to interview (I dropped out of college after a couple of years). Many of those jobs were ones that they wre going to train the person on the job for anyway...they just were interviewing graduates to weed out the "deadwood." It's unfortunate.

Until this changes most girls will need to get the degree. My daughter is a freshman now at university.

Years ago, people used to read law themselves and then take the bar. Now I don't think that is even an option. It's as if we are saying it's impossible to learn anything without a school...which is ridiculous.

 

At 9:13 AM , Blogger Kathy said…

Just remember that for some jobs you actually need a degree to be employed in that area - teaching for example!! I don't want to be a teacher's aide for the rest of my life, I want to be qualified to stand at the front of the room, and I need a degree for that!

 
Post a Comment
<< Home
 


About Me

Name: Sheila

Home: Belleville, Ontario, Canada

About Me: I'm a Christian author of a bunch of books, and a frequent speaker to women's groups and marriage conferences. Best of all, I love homeschooling my daughters, Rebecca and Katie. And I love to knit. Preferably simultaneously.

See my complete profile

Follow This Blog:

 Subscribe to To Love, Honor and Vacuum

Follow on Twitter:
Follow on Facebook:


Important Links
Previous Posts


Categories
Popular Archived Posts
Archives
Christian Blogs
Mom Blogs
Marriage/Intimacy Blogs
Blogs For Younger/Not Yet Married Readers
Housework Blogs
Cooking/Homemaking Blogs
Writing Links
Credits
Blog Design by Christi Gifford www.ArtDesignsbyChristi.com

Images from www.istockphoto.com

Related Posts with Thumbnails